Links
More GOP Sites
If You're Curious
Best of Archives
I also Blog at
Previous Posts
-
Terror in the Skies, Again? continued....
China, Taiwan and Sea Power
Another Conspiracy Theory Busted
Terror in the Skies Part II
Kidnapping Pays
What? Good News from Iraq?
Saddam's WMD Discovered?
Terror in the Skies, Again?
"Chutzpah of the Day" Award
Is al Qaeda Fleeing Iraq?
Blogroll
- Instapundit
- Chrenkoff
- new Belmont Club
- old Belmont Club
- Michelle Malkin
- Little Green Footballs
- Power Line
- Amy Ridenour
- The Middle Ground
- A New Birth of Freedom
- MuD & PhuD
- The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
- Armies of Liberation
- Iraq Files
- American War Monger
- I Love America
- (Translator)
- Flopping Aces
- Diplomad
- Dreams into Lightning
- American Conservative Blog
- USS Neverdock
- Israpundit
- Smoking Gun
- Little Red Blog
- Pseudo-Polymath
- The Evangelical Outpost
- DowneastBlog
- Asymmetrical Information
- Kender's Musings
Middle East Bloggers
- Friends of Democracy
- Healing Iraq
- The Messopotamian
- Hammorabi
- Iraq the Model
- road of a nation
- Big Pharaoh
- Iraqi Bloggers Central
Soldiers/Sailors blogs
Military / Defense
- Strategy Page
- Terrorist Scorecard
Missile Defense - Cold War Museum
- Defend America
- U.S Embassy in Baghdad
- U.S Coalition Provisional Authority
Right Opinion
Homespun Bloggers
Indispensable
Archives
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - George Orwell
Friday, July 23, 2004
"Terror in the Skies": Analysis
Thank you to Max Lane for an update on this story. Check out his post on Annie Jacobson's CNN interview. Some of what follows I posted on his site as a comment.
As Max notes, the Syrians "checked out". They are apparently real band members.
But of course, how hard is it, really, to form up a band? Sounds like the perfect cover for a terrorist group to me. These guys aren't stupid, they know we're watching for them this time. We must assume that they've got carefully constructed covers.
What also really worries me are the other stories of how we think they are "testing us" that are in the Washington Times story. If all this is true, and it seems to be, then the probability that they'll attempt an attack prior to the elections is almost 100%
The political implications of such an attack will be monumental. I was listening to Glenn Beck on the radio yesterday and he made an important point. Glenn said that the public will forgive Bush if the terrorist attack from an unforeseen direction. If they hit a train, bridge, ship, or something else, the public will probably "rally around the president". But, if the terrorists pull off another 9/11 the reaction will be just the opposite. People will say "you've had plenty of time to prevent this, and you let us down. We are not more safe with you in the White House." And they'll be right.
|
As Max notes, the Syrians "checked out". They are apparently real band members.
But of course, how hard is it, really, to form up a band? Sounds like the perfect cover for a terrorist group to me. These guys aren't stupid, they know we're watching for them this time. We must assume that they've got carefully constructed covers.
What also really worries me are the other stories of how we think they are "testing us" that are in the Washington Times story. If all this is true, and it seems to be, then the probability that they'll attempt an attack prior to the elections is almost 100%
The political implications of such an attack will be monumental. I was listening to Glenn Beck on the radio yesterday and he made an important point. Glenn said that the public will forgive Bush if the terrorist attack from an unforeseen direction. If they hit a train, bridge, ship, or something else, the public will probably "rally around the president". But, if the terrorists pull off another 9/11 the reaction will be just the opposite. People will say "you've had plenty of time to prevent this, and you let us down. We are not more safe with you in the White House." And they'll be right.
|
Comments:
Post a Comment

