Links
More GOP Sites
If You're Curious
Best of Archives
I also Blog at
Previous Posts
-
Disposable When Broken?
Reform at the UN - or Replacement?
Overplaying our Hand
All But Over for Terri
Back to the Magic Kingdom
Yemeni Journalist Freed!
The View from Fallujah
The Left Dissected
Bad News Today
Moonbats on Parade
Blogroll
- Instapundit
- Chrenkoff
- new Belmont Club
- old Belmont Club
- Michelle Malkin
- Little Green Footballs
- Power Line
- Amy Ridenour
- The Middle Ground
- A New Birth of Freedom
- MuD & PhuD
- The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
- Armies of Liberation
- Iraq Files
- American War Monger
- I Love America
- (Translator)
- Flopping Aces
- Diplomad
- Dreams into Lightning
- American Conservative Blog
- USS Neverdock
- Israpundit
- Smoking Gun
- Little Red Blog
- Pseudo-Polymath
- The Evangelical Outpost
- DowneastBlog
- Asymmetrical Information
- Kender's Musings
Middle East Bloggers
- Friends of Democracy
- Healing Iraq
- The Messopotamian
- Hammorabi
- Iraq the Model
- road of a nation
- Big Pharaoh
- Iraqi Bloggers Central
Soldiers/Sailors blogs
Military / Defense
- Strategy Page
- Terrorist Scorecard
Missile Defense - Cold War Museum
- Defend America
- U.S Embassy in Baghdad
- U.S Coalition Provisional Authority
Right Opinion
Homespun Bloggers
Indispensable
Archives
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - George Orwell
Wednesday, March 30, 2005
Another Plus for John Bolton
Another reason why John Bolton should be our new ambassador to the United Nations are the reasons given for opposing him. Yesterday fifty-eight ex-diplomats sent a letter to Republican Senator Richard Lugar, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, in which they urged Congress to reject his nomination. The diplomats came from both Republican and Democrat administrations, which tells us all we need to know about why we're in our current situation.
Tellingly, Jeanne Kirkpatrick, ambassador to the UN under Reagan, did not sign the letter (or at least I can't find that she did. However, I'm sure that if she did her name would have been mentioned in news stories. I am so far unable to find the actual letter on the Internet).
If anyone can find the actual letter please post the links in the comments section. I've searched the usual big-name blogs but can't find anything on it yet. |
Their criticism dwelled primarily on Bolton's stand on issues as the State Department's senior arms control official. They said he had an "exceptional record'' of opposing U.S. efforts to improve national security through arms control.I'm not sure exactly what this refers to, but I'll tell you that in my opinion pursuing arms control misses the point. The reason why there are conflicts is due to opposing ideologies and ways of thinking, which are brought to the forefront by totalitarian and dicatatorial regimes. The best way to improve national security is to spread democracy. Now, that said, certainly preventing the spread of some weapons is beneficial. But simple pursuit of arms control does not necessarily enhance our national security.
Well, good. I don't want him to "negotiate", I want him to clean up the place. The old go-along-get-along-don't-ruffle-feathers attitude is what got us into this situation in the first place. Enough of the old way. We're going from Andrew Young to Jeanne Kirkpatrick here. And just as the left screamed bloody murder when Kirkpatrick went to the UN and gave them hell, they're screaming now.But the former diplomats also chided Bolton for his "insistence that the U.N. is valuable only when it directly serves the United States.''
That view, they said, would not help him negotiate with other diplomats at the United Nations.
Further, the problem with the UN directly serving the United States is...?
Tellingly, Jeanne Kirkpatrick, ambassador to the UN under Reagan, did not sign the letter (or at least I can't find that she did. However, I'm sure that if she did her name would have been mentioned in news stories. I am so far unable to find the actual letter on the Internet).
If anyone can find the actual letter please post the links in the comments section. I've searched the usual big-name blogs but can't find anything on it yet. |
Comments:
Post a Comment

