Links
More GOP Sites
If You're Curious
Best of Archives
I also Blog at
Previous Posts
-
Saudi Arabia Torture Update
Stand up for Israel
Brilliant
Join Us...
Casualties of War
Resign, Kofi, Resign!
All the Right Enemies (and Friends!)
Nostalgia for a Dictator?
Saudi Deal with the Devil
The Near Capture of Zarqawi
Blogroll
- Instapundit
- Chrenkoff
- new Belmont Club
- old Belmont Club
- Michelle Malkin
- Little Green Footballs
- Power Line
- Amy Ridenour
- The Middle Ground
- A New Birth of Freedom
- MuD & PhuD
- The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
- Armies of Liberation
- Iraq Files
- American War Monger
- I Love America
- (Translator)
- Flopping Aces
- Diplomad
- Dreams into Lightning
- American Conservative Blog
- USS Neverdock
- Israpundit
- Smoking Gun
- Little Red Blog
- Pseudo-Polymath
- The Evangelical Outpost
- DowneastBlog
- Asymmetrical Information
- Kender's Musings
Middle East Bloggers
- Friends of Democracy
- Healing Iraq
- The Messopotamian
- Hammorabi
- Iraq the Model
- road of a nation
- Big Pharaoh
- Iraqi Bloggers Central
Soldiers/Sailors blogs
Military / Defense
- Strategy Page
- Terrorist Scorecard
Missile Defense - Cold War Museum
- Defend America
- U.S Embassy in Baghdad
- U.S Coalition Provisional Authority
Right Opinion
Homespun Bloggers
Indispensable
Archives
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - George Orwell
Friday, May 13, 2005
On Casualties and War
Just a few thoughts this morning as I'm off to work on another threat assessment for our new Threats Watch site. Then it's off to work (oh yeah, that).
Anyone who's followed the news recently knows that casualties from bombings in Iraq are up. The number of dead and wounded are almost double what they were not too many months ago.
I have no doubt that this will prompt the usual suspects to declare that all is lost and that we have failed.
Need we point out to them that casualty rates is a very poor way of determining who is winning and who is losing? Apparently so.
The most bloody battles we fought in World War II were near the end of the war. Iwo Jima and Okinawa were fought in the closing months of the war, the former in February and March, and the latter in April of 1945.
Iwo Jima cost some 7,000 Americans their lives, and Okinawa 12,000. The battle for Okinawa was a marked by mistake after mistake on our side, starting with a gross underestimation of the number of Japanese troops on the island (we estimated 65,000, it turned out the number was more like 130,000). We had no real counter to the kamikaze, which devastated our navy and support vessels.
The situation was no better in Europe. We were totally taken by surprise by a German offensive in December of 1944, in what became known as the Battle of the Bulge. Many American units were completely overrun, and we only turned the tide when the Wehrmacht ran out of gas and the weather improved to where we could use our air power. As it was, we lost some 19,000 lives.
No Neat Lines
Today we have no neat maps where we can draw the "front line". The enemy does not make it easy be organizing in neat identifiable western-style military units that we can mark with pins.
No, this time we have to actually think. That's right, use our heads and try to analyze exactly what is going on. I don't have the time or expertise to do that right now, so if you want the best go to these sites, where I assure you you'll be amply rewarded:
Belmont Club
Bill Roggio
Strategy Page
Al-Qaeda Organization Chart
As promised, Bill Roggio has posted a link to an organization chart to Al-Qaeda in Iraq (link to download here) |
Anyone who's followed the news recently knows that casualties from bombings in Iraq are up. The number of dead and wounded are almost double what they were not too many months ago.
I have no doubt that this will prompt the usual suspects to declare that all is lost and that we have failed.
Need we point out to them that casualty rates is a very poor way of determining who is winning and who is losing? Apparently so.
The most bloody battles we fought in World War II were near the end of the war. Iwo Jima and Okinawa were fought in the closing months of the war, the former in February and March, and the latter in April of 1945.
Iwo Jima cost some 7,000 Americans their lives, and Okinawa 12,000. The battle for Okinawa was a marked by mistake after mistake on our side, starting with a gross underestimation of the number of Japanese troops on the island (we estimated 65,000, it turned out the number was more like 130,000). We had no real counter to the kamikaze, which devastated our navy and support vessels.
The situation was no better in Europe. We were totally taken by surprise by a German offensive in December of 1944, in what became known as the Battle of the Bulge. Many American units were completely overrun, and we only turned the tide when the Wehrmacht ran out of gas and the weather improved to where we could use our air power. As it was, we lost some 19,000 lives.
No Neat Lines
Today we have no neat maps where we can draw the "front line". The enemy does not make it easy be organizing in neat identifiable western-style military units that we can mark with pins.
No, this time we have to actually think. That's right, use our heads and try to analyze exactly what is going on. I don't have the time or expertise to do that right now, so if you want the best go to these sites, where I assure you you'll be amply rewarded:
Belmont Club
Bill Roggio
Strategy Page
Al-Qaeda Organization Chart
As promised, Bill Roggio has posted a link to an organization chart to Al-Qaeda in Iraq (link to download here) |
Comments:
Hey, excellent website. A great Iraq resource is Deaths in Iraq. It breaks all of the casualties down by age, race, branch of the military, country, etc.
Post a Comment


